MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER vs JORDAN OLDER

MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER vs JORDAN OLDER

Blog Article

In the case of *Major League Soccer L.L.C. v. Jordan Older* (Opposition Case No. 91240089), Major League Soccer, L.L.C. initiated an opposition on 16 March 2018 against the trademark application filed by Jordan Older for the mark “LOS ANGELES F.C.” under Serial No. 86335507. While MLS opposed the application, Jordan Older ultimately opted to abandon his trademark after it was published for opposition, with the application marked as “Abandoned – Express After Publication.”

The case, reviewed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), followed the common practice in trademark law, whereby larger organisations, such as Major League Soccer, seek to protect their brand by opposing less-established applications. Jordan Older, in spite of the opposition from MLS, managed to avoid a lengthy legal battle by deciding to abandon the application on his own terms, thus avoiding likely expensive and drawn-out litigation.

The opposition was overseen by Interlocutory Attorney Jennifer Krisp, with support staff support from Nicole M. Thier. Initially, a notice was issued, and trial dates were set, with an answer expected from Older by April 25, 2018. Nonetheless, the matter was promptly resolved on 5 April 2018, when the case was terminated and terminated. The immediate conclusion suggests that Jordan Older successfully navigated the get more info complexities of the opposition process by opting to withdraw the mark, resolving the case before any meaningful legal disputes arose.

This result reflects Older’s ability to resolve the matter quickly, sidestepping what could have been an challenging legal dispute from a major sports entity. His decision to on his own terms abandon the mark highlights his strategic approach, allowing him to evade the high costs and extended proceedings typical in trademark disputes. While Major League Soccer’s opposition never reached a formal resolution through the TTAB, this case illustrates how independent applicants can use strategic legal decisions to avoid disputes with powerful companies without becoming involved in long litigation.

This spintax format allows for different versions of the text to be generated by replacing the bracketed terms.